C& América Latina: What role do you think Panalandia and Mente Publica play within the current film industry in Panama?
Said Isaac: I think both spaces play a very important role. In the case of Panalandia, our work has been with changing the negative perception people had of Panamanian cinema in a way that allowed them to appreciate cinema in a different way. It’s easy to criticize an audiovisual work but, for you to appreciate it, you need to understand the circumstances in which it was made. I find that – because of the way it’s often portrayed – many of us have this idea that filmmaking is something for those with money and resources. But here that’s not the case. Here, the person filming in a certain neighborhood, for instance, is most likely from there and very much involved or affected by the themes of the story they’re telling. So I think raising that awareness was an important achievement.
Another positive in that sense is that more people feel inspired to create. That’s important because it also happens at times aspiring filmmakers are simply waiting to be hired by a foreign producer, for instance, as opposed to aspiring to create. Nowadays there are many filmmakers who got their start at Panalandia and are now graduating onto larger, more commercial circuits. These are very important steps which I think would not have happened had Panalandia not existed.
Our production company – Mente Publica, is a great example of what we’ve been preaching. One of our first and most successful films, Kenke, was a low-budget production which at its peak was picked up by HBO. We were a group of friends who got together and counted on little more than a low-budget DSLR camera and a team of inexperienced actors. So, I think these kinds of examples showed that, far more important than the latest gear, the key is really what you’re saying and why you’re saying it. It allowed other producers and filmmakers to realize “if they can do it, so can I”.
C&AL: Are there specific themes you look for in a film when deciding to produce it?
SI: Definitely. I have never been a producer who produces a film for the sake of it; all projects I choose to produce must have something that moves me, something that connects with me and something where I feel I can contribute. At the moment, for instance, I am producing three documentaries, Baba by Harry Oglivie, Cuscú by Risseth Yanguez and Dadjira De (Nuestra Casa) by Iván Jaripio, revolving around themes of identity, marginalized experiences, social injustice and institutional racism in Panama. People are not always ready to engage with such dense discourses, but I feel that it’s our duty to talk about them because, well, we have to and because we are immersed in these stories on a daily basis.
When thinking of a film, we [Mente Publica] always think of how it could be a universal story: a story that anyone can identify with, in any part of the world. Obviously, that’s always a challenge but, for me, films are interesting when I can immerse myself in the cultural setting where they take place. That, as well as the story, of course, are what make a film that much more interesting. In this sense, I think the more local it is in terms of its cultural richness the more global it becomes.